Does IDW mean SJWs are SOL?

The woke movement hits you hard with its theology. And after simmering in social science departments for years, those doctrines have reached a threshold: apostates can be identified …… and they’re increasingly being cancelled.

Now, with the public conversion of Democratic Party and social media elites to the social justice agenda, the movement’s authoritarian tendencies are being leveraged and scaled. So …… what happens next?

Isaac Newton taught us that for every action there’s an opposite reaction …… a law that seems to apply to politics as much as physics. Therefore, the credentialed class breathlessly awaits a draconian response from “the right.” As their thinking goes, “the left” has made their bold, riotous move in 2020, so the other shoe is bound to drop. Right?

In one sense, they’re correct: an equal and opposite reaction is occurring. But in another sense, they’ve missed the bigger picture. A push-back has already arrived. And it’s coming from …… the left.

The citizenempowering left is now constructing sound arguments against centralist left overreach. This new group’s members have been privately intense and passionate about woke’s excesses . Ironically, however, their public statements were initially muted. They know they’re in an existential fight for beliefs they hold dear. But their voices don’t yet reflect the full-throated confidence of a stand-alone movement. That will come soon enough, though.

This new group is best represented by members of the intellectual dark web, a phrase coined half-facetiously by one of its founders: Eric Weinstein. The IDW does contain a few right-leaning figures, but most members self-label as liberal, including Weinstein, his brother Bret (of Evergreen State College fame), Joe Rogan, Sam Harris, and others.

The IDW was joined in quick order by signatories to the Harper’s Magazine letter on open debate. It was a direct response to the social justice movement’s increasing embrace of cancel culture. Long time free speech liberals like Jonathan Haidt, Nicholas Christakis, and John McWhorter were joined by new converts to citizism like Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling.

The shift is even impacting journalism. Glenn Greenwald has advocated citizen empowerment for awhile. Matt Taibbi is now asserting his voice. And Bari Weiss defined her sharp break with the SJWs in a resignation letter to the New York Times.

The IDW and its allies are not the early adopters, however. James Howard Kunstler, Chris Martenson, and Charles Hugh Smith, among others, have eloquently outlined the principles of these positions since the early 2000s, and earlier. Later-arriving figures will continue to settle the territory they’ve pioneered.

This new force won’t remain beneath the radar for long. Legacy media will soon proclaim “a civil war within liberal ideology.” These headlines will be titillating, but the credentialed class will continue to overlook basic structural divisions in the partisan spectrum. A fundamental axis has always bisected the left side of the circle, just as it has on the right ……

The cries now emerging from the lower left quadrant hearken back to Paul Revere. They proclaim, “The authoritarians are coming!” But this is not a case of diametric opposition. These citizen-empowering figures still declare their allegiance to maternally-weighted liberal values. Their beef with the social justice movement is not with woke values. Instead, the growing woke preference for top-down institutional leverage is being stridently opposed.

When I first began to speak publicly about the political circle, a common response was, “But there’s no one in the lower quadrants.” Sometimes it was clarified with examples: “Ron Paul is in the lower right, and Ralph Nader is in the lower left, but they’re getting up there in age. Who will take their place?”

They were reasonable questions. The lower left quadrant was demographically denuded by the late nineteenth century’s progressive movement. For most of the twentieth century, it was a barren land. Most liberals believed, as a matter of faith, that the best shot at a better society lay with large regulating institutions.

That has shifted imperceptibly and gradually, however. Bret Weinstein said it concisely: “I used to believe in top down solutions. But I no longer think that works.” That shift preceded today’s rift between the social justice movement and its new adversaries. In the short term, the lower left will stand staunchly against the excesses of centralist liberalism. Its voices will gain confidence. The battle will be joined.

In the longer term, however, adjacent quadrants must form alliances. And the left side quadrants have too much in common to remain in perpetual existential conflict. Like the right, they must eventually strike some balance between centralized and citizen-based power. If they fail to do so, events will overtake ideology.

It will likely take the better part of our decade to resolve these issues. All four quadrants will take the field. Social questions will intersect with new economic constraints. And the America of 2030 will look vastly different from the America of 2020 …… if it survives intact.

So the answer to the title of this post is “no.” The SJWs are not SOL. But they are due for a comeuppance. There’s a new political force in America. It’s a citizen-empowering liberalism that believes in the power of emergent, self-organizing systems. That new force here to stay.

1 Comment

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s